"If Mitt Romney's an economic heavyweight, we're in trouble."

Last post 05-09-2012 11:28 AM by Barbara Jones. 14 replies.
Page 1 of 1 (15 items)
Sort Posts: Previous Next
  • 05-06-2012 2:32 PM

    "If Mitt Romney's an economic heavyweight, we're in trouble."

    Short DNC video: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=EcwWJ32wKgg&feature=player_embedded
  • 05-07-2012 4:53 AM In reply to

    Re: "If Mitt Romney's an economic heavyweight, we're in trouble."

    Compared to ovomit a bug has more economic qualifications
  • 05-07-2012 9:52 AM In reply to

    Re: "If Mitt Romney's an economic heavyweight, we're in trouble."

    Interesting...I would say the two are about on Par as far as economics...Both may not be the most capable at economics but both candidates are excellent managers and therefore have demonstrated the ability to find qualified people to be part of their teams....Both of these candidates, Obama and Romney are both quite centrist in economics...But it matters little as the American Public will not elect Romney...he is too plastic...they people will not care if he was Super Economic Man and could just fix the economy out of his own pocket...they would look at him and say...nope not cool enough....sad..really...if it were not for this Ron Paul would be the Candidate...He is after all exactly the candidate the Republicans claim to want...but they ignore him cause he is old and kooky....lol
  • 05-07-2012 5:37 PM In reply to

    Re: "If Mitt Romney's an economic heavyweight, we're in trouble."

    Iceman what do you have to backup your statement so that it does not sound like hotair , sour grapes, or just plain white supremecist prejudice ? Cause the economic data proves the opposite : Economic activity in the manufacturing sector expanded in April for the 33rd consecutive month, and the overall economy grew for the 35th consecutive month, say the nation's supply executives in the latest Manufacturing ISM Report On Business®.Of the 18 manufacturing industries, 16 are reporting growth in April, in the following order: Furniture & Related Products; Printing & Related Support Activities; Machinery; Nonmetallic Mineral Products; Miscellaneous Manufacturing; Primary Metals; Paper Products; Transportation Equipment; Electrical Equipment, Appliances & Components; Plastics & Rubber Products; Apparel, Leather & Allied Products; Food, Beverage & Tobacco Products; Chemical Products; Fabricated Metal Products; Computer & Electronic Products; and Petroleum & Coal Products. The only industry reporting contraction in April is Wood Products. BTW, we lost manufacturing under the last few republican presidents and under Clinton with his republican congress we lost manufacturing this is the first gain in manufacturing instead of loss for many years and it took a democratic congress with a democratic president to accomplish it..
  • 05-07-2012 6:45 PM In reply to

    Re: "If Mitt Romney's an economic heavyweight, we're in trouble."

    Failed community organizer, part term state senator, part term US senator, disbarred, Rezko land deal...try looking into your God instead of bowing at his racist feet!... The loss with the last few republican presidents was thanks to your demorats in the house, they had the majority for years! & clever to report nonmetalics and coal twice!
  • 05-07-2012 7:25 PM In reply to

    Re: "If Mitt Romney's an economic heavyweight, we're in trouble."

    Iceman,   now that is a sourgrapes reply if I ever heard one,   went from community organizer to state senator if he failed would not have gotten the votes to be state senator, went from state senator to US senator , lol.  failures do not get promoted. and the dems did not have the majority under the republican pres first 2 years when all the major legislation was passed same as under this pres nothing much get's done when a pres has to work with an opposing majority in congress.    Poor Iceman if that is the best you can do you just sunk yourself to the point of no return and drowned in your own most obvious biased sour grapes..
  • 05-08-2012 12:27 AM In reply to

    Re: "If Mitt Romney's an economic heavyweight, we're in trouble."

    Do just a tiny bit of research about that senate race and post an honest reply....oops, that is above your skill set. As far as sour grapes you are a hoot, it has been over 3 years and no budget!! 2 of those was your high and mighty hero majority...
  • 05-08-2012 12:37 AM In reply to

    Re: "If Mitt Romney's an economic heavyweight, we're in trouble."

    Supremacist prejudice, too funny, your God is half white!! now you on the other hand are all libtard!
  • 05-08-2012 3:55 AM In reply to

    Re: "If Mitt Romney's an economic heavyweight, we're in trouble."

    LOL  Iceman, first of all Obama is about as far from what I would look for in a GOD as anyone could get.  I would expect a GOD to strike anyone dead who talks as much trash as you do about them LMAO and create instant miracles like healing everyone so that no one even needs healthcare, etc etc etc.  .  AND,  I know Obama played hardball in the senate race but still had to have enough votes to even be able to play hardball, otherwise he would not have been a contender in the first place.  And as far as most supremacist goes Obama being half white just makes them hate him more as a prime example of what they can't stand and fear the most,   which is  mixing of races.  You just dig yourself deeper  with your drama queen replies everytime you post lately.
  • 05-08-2012 12:24 PM In reply to

    Re: "If Mitt Romney's an economic heavyweight, we're in trouble."

    ....And I Second These Comments. .. Good one Barb! __________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
    Barbara Jones:
    LOL  Iceman, first of all Obama is about as far from what I would look for in a GOD as anyone could get.  I would expect a GOD to strike anyone dead who talks as much trash as you do about them LMAO and create instant miracles like healing everyone so that no one even needs healthcare, etc etc etc.  .  AND,  I know Obama played hardball in the senate race but still had to have enough votes to even be able to play hardball, otherwise he would not have been a contender in the first place.  And as far as most supremacist goes Obama being half white just makes them hate him more as a prime example of what they can't stand and fear the most,   which is  mixing of races.  You just dig yourself deeper  with your drama queen replies everytime you post lately.
  • 05-08-2012 3:00 PM In reply to

    Re: "If Mitt Romney's an economic heavyweight, we're in trouble."

    I can't wait to see Iceman denying that the federal government actually realized a  budget surplus for the first time in years this month with Obama as president.    BTW,  I never responded to Iceman false claim that there is no budget.  BY LAW iCEMAN when a new budget is not set the last budget that was set remains intact as the current budget until a new budget IS SET.
  • 05-09-2012 10:33 AM In reply to

    Re: "If Mitt Romney's an economic heavyweight, we're in trouble."

    oh look, libtards now know the mind of God
  • 05-09-2012 10:36 AM In reply to

    Re: "If Mitt Romney's an economic heavyweight, we're in trouble."

    that explains the surplus....not, trillions in spending with a three year old budget, more libtard numbers to make the pathetic one look less incompetent
  • 05-09-2012 11:23 AM In reply to

    Re: "If Mitt Romney's an economic heavyweight, we're in trouble."

     LOL   iceman and if they had passed a new budget you would just claim they hiked the budget to play games with numbers and make it look like they had a surplus.    Claiming that about a three year old budget just does not wash.   Sorry but your argument this time is what is pathetic.
  • 05-09-2012 11:28 AM In reply to

    Re: "If Mitt Romney's an economic heavyweight, we're in trouble."

    Also in regards to your silly drama queen reply regarding knowing the mind of GOD,   Well my dear I did not say I know the mind of God and neither did anyone else.  What I pointed out was what I, Me, Myself.  would expect from a GOD  and there is a major dif there, SIGH,  not sure you will be able to figure that out though.
Page 1 of 1 (15 items)